4 QA Paradoxes That Should Be Forgotten for Good

In the world of software development, Quality Assurance (QA) often finds itself wrapped in a web of outdated beliefs. These misconceptions can shape how teams view QA, leading to unnecessary friction, misplaced priorities, or a lack of appreciation for what testing truly brings to the table.

Non-Member Link

Cover Image

If you’ve ever heard statements like, “Can’t we automate everything?” or “Why are testers always breaking the code?” then you’ve encountered some of these paradoxes firsthand. They’re not just annoying — they actively get in the way of building better software.

Let’s dive into four common QA paradoxes, why they don’t make sense, and why it’s high time to leave them behind.

1. “Testers Break the Code”

• Why it’s a paradox: Testers don’t break code; they uncover flaws that already exist. Yet, this outdated idea portrays testers as the antagonists in the development process.
• Why it should go: This belief damages team collaboration and shifts focus from fixing problems to blaming those who found them. Quality is a team responsibility, and testers are here to strengthen the process, not disrupt it.
  Let’s reframe this: “Testers help teams discover blind spots, ensuring a stronger product for everyone.”